Showing posts with label voting rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label voting rights. Show all posts

Friday, February 14, 2014

Tom Perkins: I've Got Your Million Votes Right Here (Genteel Gesture, Mine)

Tip o'the hat to Scarce at Daily Kos and to CNN Money for digging deep, journalistically, to find something redemptive to throw at the story --

The audience at the Commonwealth Club reacted with laughter. But Perkins offered no immediate indication that he was joking. Asked offstage if the proposal was serious, Perkins said: "I intended to be outrageous, and it was."
Perkins, the great wit, is author of the phrase "the war on the 1%," as well as his nervous twitch of an exposition thereupon in the WSJ on 24 January 2014: 



Regarding your editorial "Censors on Campus" (Jan. 18): Writing from the epicenter of progressive thought, San Francisco, I would call attention to the parallels of fascist Nazi Germany to its war on its "one percent," namely its Jews, to the progressive war on the American one percent, namely the "rich." 
From the Occupy movement to the demonization of the rich embedded in virtually every word of our local newspaper, the San Francisco Chronicle, I perceive a rising tide of hatred of the successful one percent. There is outraged public reaction to the Google buses carrying technology workers from the city to the peninsula high-tech companies which employ them. We have outrage over the rising real-estate prices which these "techno geeks" can pay. We have, for example, libelous and cruel attacks in the Chronicle on our number-one celebrity, the author Danielle Steel, alleging that she is a "snob" despite the millions she has spent on our city's homeless and mentally ill over the past decades. 
This is a very dangerous drift in our American thinking. Kristallnacht was unthinkable in 1930; is its descendant "progressive" radicalism unthinkable now?

Giving you a moment to recover from the shock of the abject cruelty of the SF Chronicle besmirching San Francisco's "number-one celebrity" as a snob... I hope that knowing Steel's net worth of $375 million will bring her enough electoral clout to somehow right that wrong may be of some comfort to you.

Clearly, though, Perkins doesn't read enough of the Chronicle, as SFGate (the e-version) covered Steel's altruism in sympathetic depth quite a few years ago. An excerpt on how her efforts to help battle homelessness began tells part of the tale:

But almost no one, except for the crew she worked with, her children and two close friends, had any idea that for 11 years, beginning in 1998, Danielle Steel would slip away from her Pacific Heights home under midnight shadows into a van filled with supplies to assist homeless people she sought out in the dark, dingy corners of San Francisco. 
Last month, the prolific author released three books: A novel, "The Sins of the Mother"; the paperback of a previous novel, "Hotel Vendome"; and a nonfiction title, "A Gift of Hope: Helping the Homeless" (Delacorte Press; 144 pages; $20), about her work with the homeless and her outreach foundation, Yo! Angel! 
"I started this during a very lonely, desperately unhappy time in my life," says Steel, in a drawing room of her home. "After Nicky (her son who committed suicide in 1997) died, I went to church and prayed for a way to help. Nicky was always very kind to homeless people, buying them a sandwich or a pack of smokes. And 'helping the homeless' is what kept returning to my mind." 
As a child, Steel's first vocational dream was to become a nun.

Hell's Bells!  Perkins should have some provision in his voting scheme for doubling, nay, TRIPLING, the number of votes that a 1%-er philanthropist / artist like Steel ought to receive.  Not everyone can see past the need for mental health reform, substance abuse rehab centers, and affordable housing to the overwhelming essentials of sandwiches, smokes, and thousands of small teddy bears ["The bears were magic. Somehow, with that single gesture, we had restored not only a memory of their childhood, but a tender part of their humanity that had been missing."]

When her love affair with the city on the bay ended, due to her discovery of embezzlement by a longtime associate, and the failure of her art gallery, Steel did what all dedicated philanthropists do -- she started several foundations and moved to Paris.

To be fair, and I rarely strive for that attribution, she did discover that there was a mental health problem among San Francisco's homeless people -- mostly, in her opinion, that they "are off their meds."

Ah, I seem to be wandering again.  That's what happens when those of us who pay no taxes -- because we live on private disability (and not that nasty, besmirchable public dole!) that keeps us below the poverty line -- are allowed a computer and free access to Google's Blogger.  We just jabber on and on, wasting everyone's time.  There's no rancor in me, nary a subatomic bit, because I started work on a novel based on life at a shelter for homeless men -- a project that, clearly, I now have to call off, both because I'm worthless as a citizen and even less effective as a writer.  I am, in every way that matters, no Danielle Steel;  I am bereft of apologists with Tom Perkins' incisive ardor and bucks.

So, Dear Beloved Readers, I shall endeavor to leave you today with a trail of gratitude bread crumbs, the last being to thank Crooks and Liars for the video...


 

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Room 222: The Book

Her first novel, Freshwater Road, was published by Agate Publishing, in August 2005. it received a starred review in Publishers Weekly and was selected as one of the best books of 2005 by The Washington Post, The Detroit Free Press, The Atlanta Journal Constitution, Newsday and The Chicago Tribune. The novel won the Zora Neal Hurston/Richard Wright Award for debut fiction in 2006, as well as the American Library Association's Black Caucus Award for debut fiction the same year. Freshwater Road was reprinted by Pocket Books.
Brown University commissioned Nicholas to write a staged adaptation of Freshwater Road, which was presented in May 2008.


It's a pleasure to be able to read again.  Limitations remain, mostly due to pedestrian concerns such as eye fatigue, blurry vision after intense Tea Party-induced marathon sessions of Mahjong solitaire,  and the steady weeping from this bleeping "inflammatory reaction," as well as a highly technical Boo Hoo and Creepy Red Veined Response to the eye medications that are treating it.  No, I will NOT parse that sentence.

The first book I read was one that came "highly recommended." When shall I learn that this is a phrase for dopes?  Do I not notice that the person pronouncing it has abdicated his personal recommendation in favor of some abstract compilation of... sigh... testimonials?  Freshwater Road by Denise Nicholas.  It's a sketchy narrative about a middle-class African-American college student from Detroit who joins in the voter registration drives in Mississippi during the 1964 Freedom Summer.  People are beaten. People die.  People disappear. Children die. People are intimidated.  People rise above.  There is a dalliance with the very sexy question of what it means to be black in American, according to geography.

It's very poorly written but I figured my estimations were off, that my reluctance to pick it up again had more to do with my river of inflammatory tears than with the quality of the prose.

And my innate liberalism bullied me, pushed me around, made me finish this lousy book.  So she wasn't penning a great work.  But she was pecking her way through an important period of history in which I've great interest.  I did not learn anything, except on those occasions when I stopped to check for symptoms of Narcissistic White Liberal Diseases.  Even on those occasions, I proved remarkably healthy.

The ultimate pan?  I wouldn't even suggest this for youth as yet not introduced to the 1960s' history of civil rights' struggles.  Even factual detail is hesitantly presented, the author coming across as being as out of place in her own narrative as the protagonist facing her first use of an outhouse.

I've moved on -- to a creepy book Fred read, extolling its excellent style as well as its induction of spine shimmies.  People have been pushing books at me for the last two years, the rough period of time during which reading was a great difficulty and no fun at all.  I've a dear new friend who has authored several books, two of which I began.  I intend to finish but I am still waiting for the return of the glory days of reading -- when the words don't swim in the glare of the page, when I'm not guessing at the words instead of actually reading them as written, when I have that sense of delight to crack open the volume, yogurt at the ready, a cat leaning in (they all love "yogurt time"), and giving in to another world until my eyelids get heavy.  Now I start with fluid-laden eyelids, and often hook up to my music before making it through a single printed page.

It'll get better.

But if you have to whip your eyes back into reading shape?  Don't fall for the testimonial, the glib and slick "it comes highly recommended..." There are many senses involved in the choosing of the next right book to read, and as rotten as it sounds, relying on others' recommendations (be it the Library Journal blurb or your cousin Jan's brilliant cousin) is but part of the mosaic.

Never underestimate the cover.

Or the feel of it in the hand, the heft.

Or the "Surprise Me!" option on Amazon.com.

I'm also, forgive me, partial to the publishing house.

And do not fear nonfiction when what you need is... nonfiction.  Aha.  There, I DID learn something.

Photo Credit:  Modern American History



© 2013 L. Ryan