Showing posts with label opioid analgesics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label opioid analgesics. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Open Access CRPS Article: Pain Treatment Topics

Pain-Topics.org News/Research UPDATES
These UPDATES are a component of Pain Treatment Topics . Our mission is to serve as a noncommercial resource for healthcare professionals & their patients, providing open access to clinical news, information, research, and education for a better understanding of evidence-based pain-management practices.
Monday, September 9, 2013
Are Opioids Ineffective for Neuropathic Pain?

Neuropathic Pain
Neuropathic pain associated with various types of nerve involvement can be difficult to diagnose and treat. The use of opioid analgesic therapy is controversial due to concerns that this type of pain does not always respond well to these agents and there is potential for adverse effects. An updated systematic review examined 31 studies, involving 1,237 patients with neuropathic pain, and found intermediate-term effectiveness of opioids, but longer-term benefits for chronic conditions seem uncertain.

In this present study, Ewan D McNicol — of the Tufts Medical Center, Boston — and colleagues updated their original Cochrane systematic review first published in 2006 [McNicol et al. 2013]. As before, their assessment included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which opioid agonists were given to treat central or peripheral neuropathic pain of any etiology. Research trials were excluded if nonopioid drugs were combined with opioids or if opioids were administered epidurally or intrathecally.

This new review included 31 trials meeting inclusion criteria, studying 10 different opioids: 23 studies were from the original 2006 review and 8 additional studies were discovered for the update. Of the total, 17 studies — 392 participants with neuropathic pain, average 22 participants per study — provided efficacy data for acute exposure to opioids during less than 24 hours.

Most of these short-term studies (16) reported pain outcomes, and with contradictory results: 8 studies reported less pain with opioids than placebo; 2 reported that some but not all participants benefited; 5 reported no differences; and, 1 reported equivocal results. Six studies, with about 170 participants, found that mean pain scores with opioid were only about 15/100 points less than with placebo.
[....] [two large paragraphs are refusing to copy, please consult the original article by clicking on the title.]

COMMENTARY:
Trials included in the systematic review by McNicol and colleagues examined various painful neuropathies, but predominantly postherpetic neuralgia and peripheral diabetic neuropathy. Few trials included patients with back pain primarily of neuropathic origin, which may be common in some patient populations.
This could be important, since it often is difficult to diagnose back pain as being purely neuropathic in origin, without also including a nociceptive component that might be amenable to opioid therapy. Along with that, in the current review, there were insufficient numbers of participants diagnosed with each type of neuropathy to perform subanalysis of efficacy or safety, which lessens the precision and clinical usefulness of the conclusions.
McNicol et al. suggest several other points of some importance….


  • The lack of efficacy found with short-term opioid administration should not be interpreted as predictive of whether administration of opioid analgesics could be helpful longer-term for neuropathic pain in individual patients.
  • Despite study limitations and possible sources of bias, the NNT outcomes (as noted above) do suggest that opioids may reduce various forms of neuropathic pain. Therefore, McNicol and colleagues suggest that “opioids at low-to-moderate doses are suitable for use over periods of weeks to months in the treatment of neuropathic pain.”
  • The use of a single dimension (eg, pain scales) for efficacy assessment in the available studies is problematic, since neuropathic pain is a multidimensional phenomenon that varies from one patient to the next. Also, it is important to demonstrate improvements in specific features of neuropathic pain (eg, evoked or burning pain, etc), in emotional or physical aspects of functioning, and/or in health-related quality of life that might be expected of truly effective analgesic therapy.
  • The meta-analyses conducted in this review showed similar opioid responsiveness for neuropathic pain of central and peripheral etiologies, but data were insufficient to resolve any debate regarding the differential efficacy of opioids for these two types of pain.
  • A dose-dependent analgesic effect was found in 2 studies examined in the review; however, the dose ranges tested were still in the low-to-intermediate range and may not necessarily reflect clinical practice in some countries. McNicol et al. state, “This, along with increasing concerns about opioid toxicity, especially at higher dose ranges (greater than the daily equivalent of 200 mg of oral morphine), does not support the use of high doses of opioids for the relief of neuropathic pain.”
It is always amazing, yet important, that so many persons with pain are willing to participate in placebo-controlled trials, knowing (due to informed consent) that there is a chance they will not be administered active-drug therapy. Despite this, only 12% of participants receiving placebo withdrew due to a lack of analgesic efficacy, which suggests a considerable placebo effect in such trials. At the same time, NcNicol et al. concede that participants willing to enter these trials may not always be typical of those in everyday clinical practice.
Furthermore, the researchers observe, “intermediate-term studies are more clinically relevant than short-term studies because they assess the benefits and risks associated with opioid treatments for weeks to months; that is, they reflect how opioids are administered for neuropathic pain in clinical practice.” They conclude that intermediate-term opioid treatment has a beneficial effect over placebo for spontaneous neuropathic pain as measured by both number of participants with at least 33% and at least 50% pain relief and in mean differences in post-intervention pain intensity.
At present, however, there are inadequate data to demonstrate improvements in many aspects of emotional or physical functioning afforded by opioids in treating neuropathic pain. And, despite the favorable intermediate-term outcomes regrading pain relief, research data are lacking to verify whether opioids may provide relief of chronic neuropathic pain during administration periods longer than 6 to 12 weeks.
REFERENCE: McNicol ED, Midbari A, Eisenberg E. Opioids for neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013, Issue 8, Art. No. CD006146 [abstract here].

Sunday, October 14, 2012

ACTION ALERT from RSDSA

The RSDSA would like to make you aware of a petition currently before the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that requests labeling changes for opioid analgesics (narcotic pain medications). Since many individuals with CRPS rely on opioids as part of their medication regimen, we wanted to bring this petition to your attention.

The petition, submitted by Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), requests three specific changes to opioid analgesic labels:
1- That they no longer be prescribed for "moderate" noncancer pain, but only for "severe" noncancer pain
2- That the maximum allowable dosage per day be equivalent to 100 mg of morphine for noncancer pain
3- That this medication can only be used for a maximum duration of 90 DAYS.

What this petition appears to mandate is a "one size fits all" prescribing mentality which DOES NOT benefit the chronic pain patients in general and CRPS patients in particular.

The RSDSA has chosen to oppose the PROP petition on behalf of you, our members. On Wednesday, October 10th, The RSDSA sent this opposition letter to the FDA. Cick Here to read RSDSA letter.

[Read it in in the post following this one -- It's too impressive not to reproduce here!]

For those of you who would like to send your own individual response regarding PROP to the FDA, we encourage you to stress the specific details that your medication enables you to do that without it you would be unable to do. We suggest you use the following language to keep the message clear:
My name is  _______. As a person  who suffers with the chronic and  yet incurable pain of  CRPS,  I ask the FDA to deny the PROP petition. I use opioids as prescribed by my physician allowing me to function better and partake in life in ways I would be unable to do without this prescribed care.
 To send your comments to the FDA click here.
The category to use for your response is Individual Consumer.
Your immediate action to this issue will make a difference. To read the PROP petition,
Please forward this email along to your friends and loved ones.
Should you have any questions or would like to receive further information, please email or give me a call. 

Sincerely,
JB Signature
Jim Broatch
Executive Vice President and Director
RSDSA
877-662-7737
203-877-3790