For a brief period of time, I neglected this blog late last year, and perhaps into the beginning of 2014, largely due to an effort to work on my poetry and increase the length of some of my short fictions to something akin to book length. Every group is political. Every group leader, and definitely every group "owner," is charismatic, meaning that relationships too easily dissolve into dichotomies that are known to be false but working out the truth can be just the distraction to drive a working writer away.
So I left, downloading, I thought, all of my work -- in case I wanted to get back to work on any of it, if I ever regained the sang froid and the imagination necessary to such travail. This evening, I received an unexpected email from this writer's site, telling me that one of my poems had received a new comment. No writer of small literature can resist a comment ("maybe it will help me grow..." actually means "maybe someone really liked it!"). The reason I could not recollect the poem was that it was a final volley aimed at a truly scary individual, constantly posing as someone else in private messages, hitting on vulnerable individuals, claiming a mastery of zen, but mocking zen at every opportunity, mocking everyone at every opportunity, until he could not keep track of his games, therefore his game pieces promptly developed a new pastime of biting the gamer on the ass. This was my chunk of butt on my way out -- and he apparently JUST found it! Aloeswood was his moniker, hence my addressing "Aloe's Wood."
So it's an ad hominem poem, I am sad to say, and yet -- I like it. It is, by definition, a fallacy.
But what poem is not?
Out of the stinking crypt, he warns: noli me tangere
So I left, downloading, I thought, all of my work -- in case I wanted to get back to work on any of it, if I ever regained the sang froid and the imagination necessary to such travail. This evening, I received an unexpected email from this writer's site, telling me that one of my poems had received a new comment. No writer of small literature can resist a comment ("maybe it will help me grow..." actually means "maybe someone really liked it!"). The reason I could not recollect the poem was that it was a final volley aimed at a truly scary individual, constantly posing as someone else in private messages, hitting on vulnerable individuals, claiming a mastery of zen, but mocking zen at every opportunity, mocking everyone at every opportunity, until he could not keep track of his games, therefore his game pieces promptly developed a new pastime of biting the gamer on the ass. This was my chunk of butt on my way out -- and he apparently JUST found it! Aloeswood was his moniker, hence my addressing "Aloe's Wood."
So it's an ad hominem poem, I am sad to say, and yet -- I like it. It is, by definition, a fallacy.
But what poem is not?
Out of the stinking crypt, he warns: noli me tangere
Aloe's wood, you forget yourself.
Easy enough to do under
circumstances, bobbing just
under water, long lost
zen,
O!
As an aside -- though I held
an incarnation of you dear --
I also hold the piquant
long steel stylus,
the stylus styled to replace
Jesus' reaching, trembling,
wanting and weak, weak
hand, the stylus made
for the sticking
into you,
or lamb, or a pigeon's heart,
when I do voodoo kebobs
on the deck on
warm summer nights.
At the last electric flutter
of the urban bird's misfiring
pump, I squawk this truth:
How much you do hate
the Zen you "study"!
A scholar's pet, you
are:
O!
Which is granting you
a huge mofo of a self-deception,
but you must know I strive
but for peace. Ho!
[Hiding in my room / safe within my womb...]
I've always loved the brief smack
of the organ after
Don't talk of love
[organ smack
organ smack]
I've heard the word before;
It's sleeping in my memory.
I won't disturb the slumber of feelings that have died.
If I never loved I never would have cried.
I am a rock,
I am an island.
It's such an insipid song
and I've heard people
reference its zen while
just a reprobate few of us
hear Buddha's high-
pitched giggle.
She said:
O!
You could not have known
not without hiring
some tired detective,
how dear to me,
academically,
is the Magdalene.
So it's a throw-down, man-boy,
if you can girdle your womb
for the duration.
[I'll be gone in
twenty-nine days:
O!]
The most important words
to pass between them,
midst balm-imbued
greasy hairs waxing
dirty sweat-stinking
mildly hairy skin
(maybe hairless altogether,
by design or by aesthetic)?
The most important words
hit on by sixteenth, seventeenth
century Italians,
some lesser Dutch
(Who are the Dutch?),
the always overlooked
-- for edginess --
Spaniards, elongated, the spike,
the piercing spine put second
place,
and even later, still, even as tardy
as the nineteenth century,
the Brits, on whom the whole
idea is lost
[You've some Brit in you,
I believe. Some offshoot,
something?];
All with oiled bristles
painting plump and ivory hands
on a single brazen marble tit
(Courtesans with your selfsame
madly timed grimace
meant to charm:
Twirl and twist the nipple --
O!
Pull it long, taut taut taut,
rub the nub
zenzenzen zoom zoom)
The words that mattered
and summed, that added
surfeit to globs of tint
were noli me tangere
O!
The instant zen
of spiritual anatomy.
Author Notes
PHOTO/Painting CREDIT:, noli me tangere motif in detail by Michelangelo and Pontormo
© 2013 L. Ryan
No comments:
Post a Comment
The Haddock Corporation's newest dictate: Anonymous comments are no longer allowed. It is easy enough to register and just takes a moment. We look forward to hearing from you non-bots and non-spammers!